rawe wrote:
Thus, while we can be fairly certain we can't prove God does not exist, it is fair to ask what evidence do we have that he does exist. The reason I am an atheist is every attempt to demonstrate the existence of God fails objective analysis. Certainly Jehovah's Witnesses point to many examples, such as fulfilled prophesy, evidence of special blessings, answered prayers, people of unusual high moral character.  Like many others Jehovah God is used to explain the existence of life and the universe. Yet a careful look at all this so-called evidence fails to be convincing and in some cases a good measure of intellectual dishonesty is deployed.

I will be the first to admit my evidence that God exists is subjective. This. from my reading, seems to be one of the arguments utilized against the existence of God, because everyone's experience is different. While there are similarities in experiences, it is because there are differences in the stories that the experiences are written off.

This in turn brings up the subject of 'objective reality'. There is a unique argument I saw, where I could say with all honesty, "You have no brain" because there is no way for me to see, touch, taste, smell or hear your brain, by any objective test, you do not have a brain. Before anyone says "Well we can prove with X-ray, MRI, CT Scan, Ultrasound, et al. The problem is the results from those scans can be doctored, so they can't be considered  objective proof. They are subjective in nature that you can have to two different doctors look at any of those scans and you could get two different answers.. The only way to prove that someone has a brain objectively is to open up the skull and take a look.

"In the hegemonic state there is neither right nor law; there are only directives and regulations which the director may change daily and apply with what discrimination he pleases which the wards must obey. The wards have one freedom only: to obey without asking questions. "
Ludwig von Mises -- Human Action p. 199; p. 198